Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 7;67(8):830–840. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glr212

Table 1.

Proteins Significantly Different in GHR−/− Compared with Wild-Type (WT) Mice (p < .01)

Protein ID Isoform Numbers Fold Difference Significance Level
APOA4 3 ↑ 1.7 F(1,18) = 70.3, p = 1 × 10−7
4 ↑ 1.9 F(1,18) = 19.4, p = .0003
Total ↑ 1.6 F(1,18) = 88.8, p = 2 × 10−8
RBP-4 1 ↑ 1.8 F(1,18) = 18.2, p = .0005
2 ↑ 3.0 F(1,18) = 17.6, p = .001
3 ↑ 4.2 F(1,18) = 15.8, p = .0001
APOE 1 ↓ 8.3 F(1,18) = 10.2, p = .005
3 ↓ 2.5 F(1,18) = 46.7, p = 2 × 10−6
4 ↓ 1.7 F(1,18) = 12.9, p = .002
Total ↓ 1.6 F(1,18) = 19.7, p = .0003
MBP-C 1 ↓ 11.5 F(1,18) = 11, p = .004
2 ↓ 11.1 F(1,18) = 8.3, p = .01
HP 1 ↓ 2.6 F(1,18) = 4.7, p = .044

Notes: Protein isoform Numbers correspond to those shown in Figure 3. The fold difference was calculated as the ratio of the mean values of GHR−/− mice and WT mice (pooled samples regardless of sex or age). “↑” Means upregulation and “↓” means downregulation. Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed a significant genotype difference. APOE = apolipoprotein E; HP = haptoglobin; MBP-C = mannose-binding protein-C; RBP-4 = retinol-binding protein-4.