Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 6;12:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-33

Table 2.

Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy from autopsy studies, according to imaging finding and method

Imaging finding Number of studies Sample size Sensitivity (95% CI) tau2 for sensitivity Specificity (95% CI) tau2 for specificity Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI) Negative likelihood ratio (95% CI) DOR (95% CI)
CT
 White matter hyperintensities
2
84
73 (58, 84)
0
63 (46, 77)
0
1.96 (1.23, 3.12)
0.43 (0.25, 0.75)
4.5 (1.70, 12)
 Global assessment
1
32
18 (6, 41)

80 (55, 93)

0.88 (0.21, 3.73)
1.03 (0.74, 1.44)
0.9 (0.20, 4.50)
 Periventricular hyperintensities
3
31
85 (43, 98)
1.95
50 (11, 89)
2.12
1.70 (0.58, 5.05)
0.30 (0.04, 2.18)
5.6 (0.32, 100)
 Lacunar infarcts
1
96
12 (4, 29)

100 (57, 100)

1.40 (0.08, 23.74)
0.96 (0.73, 1.27)
∞ (0.14, ∞)
 Non-lacunar infarcts
2
79
70 (56, 81)
0
93 (80, 99)
0
12.75 (3.28, 49.60)
0.31 (0.20,0.48)
41 (8.20, 196)
 General infarcts
2
123
41 (5, 89)
2.8
78 (32, 96)
1.7
1.82 (0.22,15.20)
0.76 (0.25,2.30)
2.4 (0.10, 57)
MRI
 White matter hyperintensities 1 43 79 (52, 92) 28 (15, 46) 1.09 (0.76, 1.55) 0.78 (0.24, 2.49) 1.4 (0.33, 5.80)