. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 24.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2010 Dec;25(4):922–928. doi: 10.1037/a0019703

Table 3.

Proportions of Hits, False Alarms, and High-Confidence Responses by Age-Group in Experiment 2

Group and test	Hit	False alarm	High-confidence responses
Group and test	Hit	False alarm	Hit	Miss	Correct rejection	False alarm
Young
Face	0.98 (0.01)	0.03 (0.02)	0.96 (0.02)		0.91 (0.03)
Fact	0.92 (0.02)	0.01 (0.01)	0.92 (0.03)		0.96 (0.02)
Source	0.78 (0.04)	0.18 (0.04)	0.73 (0.04)	0.22 (0.06)	0.64 (0.05)	0.12* (0.04)
Older
Face	0.93 (0.03)	0.07 (0.02)	0.95 (0.03)		0.91 (0.03)
Fact	0.83 (0.05)	0.03 (0.01)	0.92 (0.02)		0.93 (0.03)
Source	0.75 (0.03)	0.25 (0.04)	0.70 (0.05)	0.36 (0.07)	0.61 (0.04)	0.31* (0.06)

Note. The proportions of high-confidence responses for misses and false alarms were not calculated for individual face and fact recognition because misses and false alarms were infrequent for many participants. Standard errors are shown in parentheses. Significant age-group differences are indicated by an asterisk.