Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Dec;91(12):1849–1855. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.010

Table 3. Second Transition Comparing Those With No Change, Worsening, or Improvement in First Transition.

Mobility Limitation at Second-Year Interview Mobility Limitation Status at Third-Year Interview
None Mild Moderate Severe Does Not
Walk
Death
Group 1: No Change in First Transition From First to
  Second Year
 None .825 .141 .014 .004 .001 .015
 Mild .128 .667 .103 .036 .006 .060
 Moderate .022 .144 .614 .092 .027 .101
 Severe .004 .068 .112 .490 .105 .221
 Does not walk .000 .039 .047 .089 .502 .323
Group 2: Worsening in First Transition From First to
  Second Year
 Mild .389 .487 .057 .018 .004 .045
 Moderate .088 .303 .431 .064 .011 .103
 Severe .029 .174 .230 .323 .071 .174
 Does not walk .023 .120 .111 .169 .329 .271
Group 3: Becoming Better in First Transition From
  First to Second Year
 None .502 .392 .055 .013 .002 .035
 Mild .060 .441 .280 .109 .023 .086
 Moderate .000 .135 .446 .234 .075 .111
 Severe .000 .056 .065 .352 .231 .296

NOTE: Cells with pale gray shading represent no mobility transition from 2nd to 3rd interview; dark gray shaded cells represent transitions that continue the pattern observed in the previous transition.