Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate. 2010 Nov 1;70(15):1716–1727. doi: 10.1002/pros.21207

Table 4.

Associations between RNASEL and HPCX variants and Gleason score

Controls Cases with Gleason 2–6 tumors Cases with Gleason 7–10 tumors

RNASEL n % n % OR 95% CI n % OR 95% CI

471delAAAG

 No 1212 98.0 522 98.5 1.00 - 333 90.7 1.00 -
 Yes 25 2.0 8 1.5 0.75 0.33 – 1.68 9 2.5 1.31 0.60 – 2.86

rs486907 (Arg462Gln)
 GG 572 46.2 271 50.4 1.00 - 154 43.6 1.00 -
 GA 556 44.9 227 42.2 0.85 0.68 – 1.06 162 45.9 1.07 0.83 – 1.38
 AA 109 8.8 40 7.4 0.70 0.47 – 1.04 37 10.5 1.16 0.77 – 1.77
 p-value for trend 0.043 0.42
 GA or AA vs. GG 0.83 0.68 – 1.02 1.09 0.86 – 1.39
 AA vs. GG or GA 0.75 0.51 – 1.10 1.12 0.75 – 1.67

HPCX markers
 B97 – 135 42 4.3 27 6.9 1.66 1.01 – 2.76 17 7.3 1.77 0.98 – 3.17
 DXS1205 – 188 44 4.5 31 7.9 1.84 1.14 – 2.99 11 4.9 1.12 0.56 – 2.21
 D33 – 248 168 17.3 62 16.3 0.91 0.66 – 1.26 28 12.1 0.65 0.42 – 0.99

Nr of cases and controls that were genotyped for RNASEL and HPCX vary by genetic marker

ORs and 95% CI are adjusted for age. The reference category for ORs of each allele of HPCX microsatellite markers are other alleles in the same microsatellite marker