Table 3.
Disengaged | Full Range | Neg. Affect |
Enlivened | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transference: | ||||
Hostile | .28* | −.10 | .60 ** | .22 |
Narcissistic | .27* | .00 | .43 ** | .30* |
Preoccupied | .23 | −.11 | .29* | .11 |
Positive Alliance | −.28* | .32 ** | −.35** | .52 ** |
Avoidant/Dismissing | .44 ** | −.28* | .49 ** | .04 |
Sexualized | .19 | −.07 | .38** | .25* |
Countertransference: | ||||
Hostile/Mistreated | .35** | −.17 | .79 ** | .12 |
Helpless/Inadequate | .36** | −.23 | .67 ** | .15 |
Positive/Satisfying | −.35** | .44 ** | −.62** | .44 ** |
Parental/Protective | −.07 | .20 | −.32** | .36 ** |
Overwhelmed/Disorganized | −.02 | .15 | .29 * | .55** |
Special/Overinvolved | −.08 | .22 | −.13 | .62** |
Sexualized | .16 | .06 | .17 | .29* |
Disengaged | .81 ** | −.49** | .51** | −.41** |
Affect Regulation and Experience: | ||||
Affect Regulation: | ||||
Emotional Avoidance: | .40 ** | −.31** | .52** | −.02 |
Externalization | .22 | −.07 | .57 ** | .13 |
Healthy Coping: | −.14 | .21 | −.39** | .32 ** |
Passive Avoidance: | .19 | −.19 | .13 | −.14 |
Affective Experience: | ||||
Negative Affect: | .14 | −.19 | .39 ** | −.09 |
Affect Availability: | −.59** | .70 ** | −.62** | .30 ** |
Emotional Dysregulation: | .17 | .07 | .44 ** | .26* |
Positive Affect: | −.38** | .54 ** | −.49** | .43 ** |
DSM-IV Personality DO | ||||
Cluster Symptoms: | ||||
Cluster A1 | .12 | −.13 | .33 * | .03 |
Cluster B2 | −.04 | −.03 | −.07 | −.08 |
Cluster C3 | .13 | −.12 | −.25* | −.29* |
AAI Ratings: | ||||
Coherence4 | −.09 | .23 | −.28* | .13 |
Reflective Function5 | −.08 | .00 | −.15 | −.09 |
Note: Hypothesized correlations in bold
Partial correlations controlling for Cluster B and C scores on a subset of 65 subjects for whom both IPDE and ACQ data were available
Partial correlations controlling for Cluster A and C scores on a subset of 65 subjects for whom both IPDE and ACQ data were available
Partial correlations controlling for Cluster A and B scores on a subset of 65 subjects for whom both IPDE and ACQ data were available
Pearson correlations on a subset of 59 subjects for whom both AAI and Coherence data were available
Pearson correlations on a subset of 70 subjects for whom both AAI and RF data were available
Significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
Significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)