Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2011 Dec 30;60(1):747–765. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.060

Table 1.

Runtime (in minutes) comparison a between MEMA and FLAME in FSL.

Program 3dMEMAb FLAME 1 FLAME 1+2
Outlier modeling 1 processor 4 processors
Without 8 3 6 385
With 65 20.5 --- 847
a

Group analysis on a Mac OS X 10.6.2 with 2×2.66 GHz dual-core Intel Xeon: 10 subjects, 218,379 voxels in 2×2×2 mm3 resolution inside the brain in Talairach standard space.

b

Runtime difference between MEMA t-tests TS and TKH is negligible.