Skip to main content
. 2012 May 4;303(2):G256–G262. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00099.2012

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics, anal manometry, and anal sphincter electromyography (EMG) findings by quantitative analysis in patients and controls

Comparison Between Controls and Patients
Demographic Features Controls Patients P Value Before Adjusting for Age and BMIa P Value After Adjusting for Age and BMIb
Age, yr 37.9 ± 4.9 54.0 ± 3.0* NA NA
BMI, kg/m2 25.1 ± 1.0 30.7 ± 1.6* NA NA
Number of vaginal deliveries 0 2.4 ± 1.3
Anal manometry
    Anal resting pressure 92 ± 7 53 ± 6c <0.001 0.02
    Anal squeeze pressure 203 ± 12 108 ± 14c <0.001 0.006
Anal sphincter EMGd
    Rest, no. of motor units 6.8 ± 0.6 5.1 ± 0.4 0.07 0.03
    Rest, motor unit duration, ms 5.5 ± 0.4 6.6 ± 0.4 <0.05 0.71
    Rest, polyphasic motor units, % 14 ± 2 22 ± 2 0.07 0.52
    Squeeze, no. of motor units 4.8 ± 0.3 4.2 ± 0.3 0.28 0.41
    Squeeze, motor unit duration, ms 4.6 ± 0.4 6.5 ± 0.5 0.003 0.11
    Squeeze, polyphasic motor units, % 9 ± 2 16 ± 3 0.09 0.44
a

Rank sum test for association of subject status with specific feature.

b

Multiple variable regression model to assess association of subject status with specific feature adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI).

*

P < 0.05 vs. controls.

c

Values are averaged across all sites and also across multiple maneuvers during squeeze, in each patient.

d

Quantitative analysis.