Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 25;7(7):e42108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042108

Table 2. Impact of MEMA kwa Vijana intervention and delivery strategy on VCT uptake in males & females.

EFFECT OF MEMA KWA VIJANA INTERVENTION
Intervention n/N (%) Comparison n/N (%) Unadjusted PR (95% CI) Adjusted PR1 (95% CI)
ALL PARTICIPANTS
VCT uptake 4873/6489 (75.1) 4547/6101 (74.5) 1.00 (0.78, 1.27) 0.99 (0.78, 1.25)
VCT uptake in Team 1 2822/3128 (90.2) 2577/2810 (91.7) 0.98 (0.94, 1.03) 0.98 (0.93, 1.03)
VCT uptake in Team 2 2051/3361 (61.0) 1970/3291 (59.9) 1.02 (0.85, 1.21) 1.02 (0.86, 1.22)
MALES
VCT uptake 2769/3630 (76.3) 2496/3332 (74.9) 1.01 (0.80, 1.29) 1.01 (0.80, 1.28)
VCT uptake in Team 1 1623/1790 (90.7) 1468/1607 (91.4) 0.99 (0.95, 1.03) 0.99 (0.94, 1.03)
VCT uptake in Team 2 1146/1840 (62.3) 1028/1725 (59.6) 1.04 (0.84, 1.29) 1.04 (0.84, 1.30)
FEMALES
VCT uptake 2104/2859 (73.6) 2051/2769 (74.1) 0.98 (0.77, 1.25) 0.97 (0.76, 1.23)
VCT uptake in Team 1 1199/1338 (89.6) 1109/1203 (92.2) 0.97 (0.92, 1.03) 0.98 (0.92, 1.04)
VCT uptake in Team 2 905/1521 (59.5) 942/1566 (60.2) 0.98 (0.86, 1.13) 0.99 (0.86, 1.14)
1

Adjusted for sex (analysis in all participants), and stratum, age and tribe.

2

Adjusted for sex (analysis in all participants), and stratum, age, tribe and education.