Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 25;7(7):e41459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041459

Table 2. Central composite design matrix and the responses of biomass and hydrocarbon production to Fe (x1), Mn (x2), Mo (x3) and Ni (x4).

Runs Independent variables Responses
Coded levels Biomass(g/L) Hydrocarbon (%, w/w)
x1 x2 x3 x4
1 1 1 1 1 0.246 14.82
2 −1 −1 1 1 0.292 14.31
3 1 −1 −1 1 0.251 15.45
4 −1 1 −1 1 0.296 14.56
5 1 −1 1 −1 0.124 13.99
6 −1 1 1 −1 0.120 13.42
7 1 1 −1 −1 0.136 14.83
8 −1 −1 −1 −1 0.125 13.86
9 1 −1 1 1 0.257 13.96
10 −1 1 1 1 0.320 14.12
11 1 1 −1 1 0.248 14.19
12 −1 −1 −1 1 0.306 14.00
13 1 1 1 −1 0.116 13.96
14 −1 −1 1 −1 0.121 15.26
15 1 −1 −1 −1 0.105 14.68
16 −1 1 −1 −1 0.126 13.96
17 1.72 0 0 0 0.215 20.23
18 −1.72 0 0 0 0.231 19.24
19 0 1.72 0 0 0.123 12.25
20 0 −1.72 0 0 0.121 11.59
21 0 0 1.72 0 0.118 18.57
22 0 0 −1.72 0 0.124 20.18
23 0 0 0 1.72 0.289 12.54
24 0 0 0 −1.72 0.094 11.90
25* 0 0 0 0 0.124 19.31
26* 0 0 0 0 0.120 18.46
27* 0 0 0 0 0.123 19.17
28* 0 0 0 0 0.127 20.13
29* 0 0 0 0 0.122 19.74
30* 0 0 0 0 0.126 18.45
*

Central point values contributing to the degree of freedom for pure error calculation.