Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul;50(7):2321–2329. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00506-12

Table 4.

Results of logistic regression analysis of qPCR results for marker organism combinations

No. of markers Organism BV statusa PCR categoryb statistical metric value
No. negative No. positive Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
2 A. vaginae/BVAB-2 Negative 50 11 95.4 82.0
Positive 5 103
A. vaginae/G. vaginalis Negative 47 14 95.4 77.0
Positive 5 103
A. vaginae/Megasphaera-1 Negative 53 8 94.4 86.9
Positive 6 102
BVAB-2/G. vaginalis Negative 50 11 96.3 82.0
Positive 4 104
BVAB-2/Megasphaera-1 Negative 54 7 92.7 88.5
Positive 7 101
G. vaginalis/Megasphaera-1 Positive 53 8 93.5 86.9
Negative 7 101
3 A. vaginae/BVAB-2/G. vaginalis Negative 51 10 95.4 83.6
Positive 5 103
A. vaginae /BVAB-2/Megasphaera-1 Negative 55 6 95.4 90.2
Positive 5 103
A. vaginae/G. vaginalis/Megasphaera-1 Negative 53 8 94.4 86.9
Positive 6 102
BVAB-2/G. vaginalis/Megasphaera-1 Negative 55 6 93.5 90.0
Positive 7 101
4 A. vaginae/BVAB-2/G. vaginalis/Megasphaera-1 Negative 52 9 95.4 85.2
Positive 5 103
a

BV status was defined based on a combination of NS and Amsel criteria. BV-positive samples were those with NS values of 7 to 10 and samples with NS values of 4 to 6 that met Amsel criteria.

b

Categorized using logistic regression analysis, with BV status as the dependent variable (negative = 0; positive = 1) and qPCR results from the 169 development phase samples for the different marker combinations as the independent variable.