Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul;50(7):2315–2320. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00043-12

Table 3.

Contamination of samples and plate segments in both study comparisons

Comparison and combination Result Total no. (%) of plate results No. (%) of contaminated plate segments inoculated with indicated 10-fold sputum dilution
Total
Neat 10−1 10−2 10−3 10−4 10−5
AmB10 vs AmB30
    7H10-AmB10 No contamination 93 (73) 163 (64) 190 (75) 199 (79) 228 (90) 232 (91) 232 (91) 1,244 (81)
Fungal contamination 28 (22) 71 (28) 46 (18) 41 (16) 24 (9) 22 (9) 22 (9) 226 (15)
Bacterial contamination 6 (5) 20 (8) 18 (7) 14 (6) 2 (1) 0 0 54 (4)
    7H10-AmB30 No contamination 112 (88) 203 (84) 213 (88) 218 (90) 232 (96) 232 (96) 234 (97) 1,331 (92)
Fungal contamination 11 (8) 27 (11) 19 (8) 16 (7) 9 (4) 9 (4) 7 (3) 87 (6)
Bacterial contamination 4 (4) 11 (5) 9 (4) 7(3) 0 0 0 27 (2)
AmB30 vs AmBC
    7H11-AmB30 No contamination 76 (75) 128 (62) 137 (66) 151 (73) 172 (83) 174 (84) 177 (86) 939 (76)
Fungal contamination 21 (20) 54 (26) 46 (22) 45 (22) 32 (15) 30 (14) 29 (14) 236 (19)
Bacterial contamination 5 (5) 25 (12) 24 (12) 11 (5) 3 (1) 3 (1) 1 (0) 67 (5)
    7H11-AmBC No contamination 87 (85) 157 (77) 168 (82) 181 (89) 195 (96) 196 (96) 197 (97) 1,094 (89)
Fungal contamination 11 (11) 21 (10) 12 (6) 9 (4) 6 (3) 5 (2) 6 (3) 59 (5)
Bacterial contamination 4 (4) 26 (13) 24 (12) 14 (7) 3 (1) 3 (1) 1 (0) 71 (6)