Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 28;9(74):2332–2340. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0059

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) Double-log histogram showing the distribution of binned step lengths from a four-level BM process, observed at different temporal resolutions (lags). (b) A truncated Lévy walk shows the expected linear slope in a log–log transformation of the step-length distribution, but the scale-free pattern beaks down for step-length bins larger than the truncation scale. (c) The step-length pattern from a truncated multi-scaled random walk (truncated LW-like, but extended with memory influence and return steps) shape-shifts from power-law compliance (tobs = 1), through a ‘hockey stick’ pattern (tobs = 10) to a truncated power-law pattern (larger tobs). (d) A multi-scaled random walk without step-length truncation shows a relatively noisy step-length frequency over the extreme step-length bins. Two independent distributions, dashed and solid lines, are included for the two observational scales tobs = 100 (blue-coloured) and tobs = 1000 (red-coloured), to illustrate how the frequency peaks over the noisy range vary stochastically between series when tobs is similar to—or larger—than the temporal scale for return steps (in these iterations, a return event at frequency 1 : 100 on average). The reason for the noisiness at these coarse levels of observations is explained in §4.