Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug;78(16):5753–5762. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01040-12

Table 3.

Influence of an opuE mutation on the transcriptional activity of the proH and the opuE promotersa

Strain treA fusion opuEb TreA enzyme activity (U/mg protein)
Without NaCl With 0.5 M NaCl With 1.0 M NaCl
JSB36 proH-treA + 23 ± 1 46 ± 3 122 ± 5
TMB119 proH-treA 24 ± 1 41 ± 8 109 ± 16
TRB2 opuE-treA + 25 ± 4 84 ± 5 190 ± 65
TRB12 opuE-treA 17 ± 1 77 ± 12 213 ± 17
a

Cells carrying chromosomal copies of the indicated proH-treA and opuE-treA operon reporter fusions were cultivated in either SMM, SMM with 0.5 M NaCl, or SMM with 1.0 M NaCl to mid-exponential growth phase (OD578 of 1.5) and were then harvested for TreA reporter enzyme activity assays. Each TreA activity measurement was carried out with three independently grown cultures and in each case included two technical replicates of the TreA enzyme assay.

b

Strains carrying an opuE mutation (indicated by a minus) all harbored the Δ(opuE::tet)1 allele.