Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011 Jul 25;99(1):16–28. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33158

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Plots of compressive stress against compressive strain measured at physiological (wet) condition; (A) 210–300 μm pore size and (B) 500–600 μm pore size, and at dry (dry) condition; (C) 210–300 μm pore size and (D) 500–600 μm pore size. In all plots, (i): the 1:0 scaffolds, (ii) 1:1 scaffolds, (iii) 1:2 scaffolds, (iv) 2:0 scaffolds, (v) 2:1 scaffolds. The average compressive modulus and strength were obtained from 4 samples in each group and listed in Tables 5 and 6.