Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem B. 2012 May 11;116(29):8692–8702. doi: 10.1021/jp300852d

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Structure-based models capture near-native-state fluctuations of both small proteins and large macromolecular assemblies. (A) Comparison of simulated root mean squared fluctuations (rmsf) of each residue in the 23S Ribosomal RNA (PDB codes: 3F1E, 3F1F) between the scaled cutoff map M40 and the Shadow map M61. Overlaid are the rmsf by residue, calculated using the experimental B-factors (using the isotropic approximation, rmsfri238π2Bi, where ri is the displacement of atom i and Bi is the experimental B-factor of atom i62). A residue rmsf is computed as the arithmetic average of its constituent atoms’ rmsf. Overall rmsf agreed with the B-factors for M40 at T = 0.46, and M61 at T = 0.71. The discrepancy in stability is likely due to M61 including double the Mg2+-RNA contacts, which are modeled as harmonic restraints instead of Gaussian contact potentials. Pearson correlation r between M61 and B-factors is 0.78. (B) Simulated rmsf of the Cα atoms for three globular proteins at T = 0.9. The overall agreement is very close (r > 0.9) between two different contact maps, M40 and M61.