Table II.
Pin1 staining (IHC) | p53 staining (IHC) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||||
Parameters | N | Positive | Negative | P-value | Positive | Negative | P-value |
110 | 74 | 36 | 63 | ||||
Lymph node | |||||||
Positive | 65 | 54 | 11 | 40 | 25 | ||
Negative | 45 | 20 | 25 | 0.000 | 23 | 22 | 0.277 |
Differentiation | |||||||
Low | 30 | 24 | 6 | 22 | 8 | ||
Middle | 69 | 45 | 24 | 36 | 33 | ||
High | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0.095 | 5 | 6 | 0.104 |
Stage | |||||||
I | 31 | 18 | 13 | 20 | 11 | ||
II | 40 | 34 | 6 | 22 | 18 | ||
III + IV | 39 | 29 | 10 | 0.038 | 21 | 18 | 0.626 |
TNM classification | |||||||
T1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 1 | ||
T2 | 67 | 55 | 12 | 35 | 32 | ||
T3 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 4 | ||
T4 | 24 | 19 | 5 | 0.847 | 14 | 10 | 0.275 |
T1+T2 | 75 | 62 | 13 | 42 | 33 | ||
T3+T4 | 35 | 27 | 8 | 0.492 | 21 | 14 | 0.693 |
Gender | |||||||
Female | 18 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 6 | ||
Male | 92 | 70 | 22 | 0.484 | 50 | 42 | 0.260 |
Age | |||||||
<49 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 6 | ||
50–59 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 11 | 7 | ||
60–69 | 46 | 28 | 18 | 26 | 20 | ||
>70 | 29 | 18 | 11 | 0.868 | 15 | 14 | 0.833 |
In each case, the intensity (weak, moderate or strong) and pattern (incomplete or complete) of nucleus and cytoplasm staining, and the percentage of neoplastic immunoreactive cells (cut-off of 10%) were evaluated. Tumors were scored as follows: score 0, no appreciable staining or staining in <5% neoplastic cells; score 1+, tumors with faint/barely appreciable incomplete nucleus and cytoplasm staining in 5–25% neoplastic cells; score 2+, tumors with weak to moderate complete nucleus and cytoplasm staining or containing 25–50% neoplastic cells with moderate incomplete nucleus and cytoplasm immunostaining; and score 3+, strong immunoreactivity of the entire nucleus and cytoplasm >50% neoplastic cells or containing >50% neoplastic cells with strong nucleus and cytoplasm immunoreactivity. Tumors classified as 0 or 1+ were considered ‘negative’ and those scored as 2+ or 3+ were classified as ‘positive’.