Table III.

Quality of patient records by electronic system.

	Effica		Pegasos		Finstar		p-value
	N	% (95% CI)	n	%(95% CI)	n	% (95% CI)
Patient history
Poor	87	74 (65–82)	18	56 (38–74)	14	54 (33–73)	0.003
Moderate	24	21 (14–29)	7	22 (9–40)	11	42 (23–63)
Good	6	5 (2–11)	7	22 (9–40)	1	4 (0–20)
Acute problem
Poor	24	21 (14–29)	2	6 (1–21)	2	8 (1–21)	0.140
Moderate	60	51 (42–61)	16	50 (32–68)	16	50 (32–68)
Good	33	28 (20–37)	14	44 (26–62)	14	44 (26–62)
Status
Poor	52	44 (35–54)	5	16 (5–33)	10	38 (20–60)	0.006
Moderate	37	32 (23–41)	18	28 (14–47)	6	23 (9–44)
Good	28	24 (17–33)	56 (38–74)	10	38 (20–60)
Treatment
Poor	7	6 (2–12)	0	0	1	4 (0–20)	<0.001
Moderate	73	62 (53–71)	13	41 (24–60)	17	65 (44–83)
Good	22	19 (12–27)	19	59 (41–76)	2	8 (1–25)
No treatment	10	9 (4–15)	0	0	6	23 (9–45)
Only prescriptions	5	4 (1–10)	0	0	0	0
Prescriptions
Poor	11	9 (5–16)	1	3 (0–16)	1	4 (0–20)	<0.001
Moderate	16	14 (8–21)	7	22 (9–40)	0	0
Good	31	27 (19–35)	1	3 (0–16)	1	4 (0–20)
Excellent	14	12 (7–19)	12	38 (21–56)	17	65 (44–83)
No prescriptions	45	38 (30–48)	11	34 (19–53)	7	27 (12–48)
General informative value
Poor	22	19 (12–27)	2	6 (1–21)	8	31 (14–52)	0.002
Moderate	78	67 (57–75)	16	50 (32–68)	14	54 (33–73)
Good	17	15 (9–22)	44 (26–62)	4	15 (4–35)