Skip to main content
. 2012 May 16;21(16):3575–3586. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds189

Table 5.

Overlap between VDR and SE and between VDR and AP regions within MS regions

SE-VDR AP-VDR
Expected overlap given coverage of all MS regions 0.0133% 0.0055%
Expected overlap after fixing individual coverage of MS regions 0.0204% 0.0079%
Observed overlap 0.0970% 0.1180%
Observed/expected given coverage of all MS regions 7.29 21.45
Observed/expected after fixing coverage of MS regions 4.75 14.93