Table 3.
Details of the QTLs for DSF and DFM that were identified in at least two different years
| QTL (chromosome) | Developmental period | Year | LODa | Marker intervalb | Additive effectc | R2 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qDfm1 (Chr-11) | DFM | 2006 | 8.7 | Satt519-Satt583 | 1.9 | 0.23 |
| 2007 | 9.2 | Satt128-Satt519 | 2.6 | 0.26 | ||
| 2008 | 5.8 | Satt519-Satt583 | 1.9 | 0.17 | ||
|
| ||||||
| qDsf1 (Chr-16) | DSF | 2006 | 6.1 | Sat_339-Satt414 | −1.4 | 0.09 |
| 2007 | 13.0 | Sat_339-Satt414 | −1.5 | 0.19 | ||
| 2008 | 12.5 | Sat_339-Satt414 | −1.9 | 0.17 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Predicted E2 locus (Chr-10) | DSF | 2006 | 27.9 | Satt592-Sat_038 | 3.5 | 0.58 |
| 2007 | 24.7 | Satt592-Sat_038 | 2.4 | 0.49 | ||
| 2008 | 27.4 | Satt592-Sat_038 | 3.3 | 0.51 | ||
|
| ||||||
| DFM | 2007 | 3.2 | Satt592-Sat_038 | 1.6 | 0.09 | |
| 2008 | 3.1 | Satt592-Sat_038 | 1.5 | 0.10 | ||
a
Peak value of logarithm of odds score for QTL. The threshold for QTL detection was decided using a thousand-times permutation test (Churchill and Doerge 1994).
b
LOD peak for QTL located between the marker loci.
c
A positive value indicates that the Fukuyutaka allele increases the phenotypic value (days for DSF or DFM).
d
Proportion of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL.