Table 6.
Trait | Pop. | MP | TN | MJ | SM | EP | CU | Type | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protein (1) | NJRIKY | CIM | 1 | 1; 12.4; 12.4 | 0 | – | – | MO | Zhang et al. 2004 |
Protein (2) | NJRIKY | CIM | 2 | 1; 10.5; 10.5 | 1; 6.0 | – | – | MS | Liu et al. 2009 |
Protein (3) | NJBIEX | CIM | 1 | 1; 10.5; 10.5 | 0 | – | – | MO | Liu et al. 2009 |
Protein (4) | NJRIKY | MCIM | 8 | 2; 10.9–17.0; 27.9 | 3; 15.0 | 3; 7.2 | 49.9 | MSC | Wang 2009 |
11S (1) | NJRIKY | CIM | 2 | 0 | 2; 13.4 | – | – | SO | Liu et al. 2009 |
11S (2) | NJBIEX | CIM | 2 | 2; 11.0–11.6; 22.6 | 0 | – | – | MO | Liu et al. 2009 |
7S (1) | NJRIKY | CIM | 2 | 0 | 2; 12.8 | – | – | SO | Liu et al. 2009 |
7S (2) | NJBIEX | CIM | 3 | 2; 10.7–17.8; 28.5 | 1; 9.9 | – | – | MS | Liu et al. 2009 |
11S/7S (1) | NJRIKY | CIM | 3 | 0 | 3; 20.0 | – | – | SO | Liu et al. 2009 |
11S/7S (2) | NJBIEX | CIM | 1 | 1; 14.3; 14.3 | 0 | – | – | MO | Liu et al. 2009 |
Output of dry tofu (1) | NJTFSX | CIM | 3 | 1; 22.5; 22.5 | 2; 11.8 | – | – | MS | Zhang et al. 2008c |
Output of dry tofu (2) | NJRIKY | CIM | 5 | 1; 11.9; 11.9 | 4; 28.2 | – | – | MS | Wang et al. 2008 |
Output of wet tofu | NJTFSX | CIM | 3 | 3; 19.9–25.4; 67.0 | 0 | – | – | MO | Zhang et al. 2008c |
Output of dry soymilk (1) | NJTFSX | CIM | 1 | 1; 33.8; 33.8 | 0 | – | – | MO | Zhang et al. 2008c |
Output of dry soymilk (2) | NJRIKY | CIM | 3 | 0 | 3; 21.1 | – | – | SO | Wang et al. 2008 |
Oil (1) | NJRIKY | CIM | 1 | 0 | 1; 7.4 | – | – | SO | Zhang et al. 2004 |
Oil (2) | NJBIEX | CIM | 2 | 1; 12.2; 12.2 | 1; 8.7 | – | – | MS | Zheng et al. 2006 |
Oil (3) | NJRIKY | CIM | 3 | 0 | 3; 20.2 | – | – | SO | Liu et al. 2009 |
Oil (4) | NJBIEX | CIM | 1 | 1; 10.8; 10.8 | 0 | – | – | MO | Liu et al. 2009 |
Oil (5) | NJRIKY | MCIM | 5 | 0 | 3; 15.6 | 2; 10.8 | 50.0 | SC | Li 2009 |
Palmitic (1) | NJBIEX | CIM | 3 | 3; 11.9–20.8; 48.1 | 0 | – | – | MO | Zheng et al. 2006 |
Palmitic (2) | NJRIKY | MCIM | 13 | 0 | 6; 27.0 | 7; 16.6 | 48.9 | SC | Li 2009 |
Stearic (1) | NJBIEX | CIM | 3 | 3; 11.9–39.3; 87.1 | 0 | – | – | MO | Zheng et al. 2006 |
Stearic (2) | NJRIKY | MCIM | 6 | 1; 13.2; 13.2 | 4; 16.5 | 1; 4.3 | 55.0 | MSC | Li 2009 |
Oleic (1) | NJBIEX | CIM | 3 | 2; 11.3–13.0; 24.3 | 1; 9.4 | – | – | MS | Zheng et al. 2006 |
Oleic (2) | NJRIKY | MCIM | 6 | 0 | 3; 12.6 | 3; 10.2 | 61.6 | SC | Li 2009 |
Linoleic (1) | NJBIEX | CIM | 4 | 2; 11.0–13.9; 24.9 | 2; 16.6 | – | – | MS | Zheng et al. 2006 |
Linoleic (2) | NJRIKY | MCIM | 5 | 0 | 3; 11.7 | 2; 8.5 | 56.1 | SC | Li 2009 |
Linolenic (1) | NJBIEX | CIM | 3 | 1; 13.5; 13.5 | 2; 17.8 | – | – | MS | Zheng et al. 2006 |
Linolenic (2) | NJRIKY | MCIM | 10 | 0 | 7; 28.5 | 3; 7.5 | 53.2 | SC | Li 2009 |
Total protein and oil (1) | NJRIKY | CIM | 5 | 2; 10.5–12.6; 23.1 | 3; 27.0 | – | – | MS | Liu et al. 2009 |
Total protein and oil (2) | NJBIEX | CIM | 1 | 1; 10.6; 10.6 | 0 | – | – | MO | Liu et al. 2009 |
Total daidzin group content | NJRIKY | CIM | 3 | 0 | 3; 19.8 | – | – | SO | Wang 2008 |
Daidzein content | NJRIKY | CIM | 6 | 0 | 6; 34.0 | – | – | SO | Wang 2008 |
Daidzin content | NJRIKY | CIM | 2 | 1; 17.6; 17.6 | 1; 7.9 | – | – | MS | Wang 2008 |
Acetyldaidzin content | NJRIKY | CIM | 9 | 0 | 9; 55.5 | – | – | SO | Wang 2008 |
Malonyldaidzin content | NJRIKY | CIM | 7 | 1; 10.4; 10.4 | 6; 35.6 | – | – | MS | Wang 2008 |
Glycitein content | NJRIKY | CIM | 9 | 0 | 9; 47.9 | – | – | SO | Wang 2008 |
Glycitin content | NJRIKY | CIM | 9 | 0 | 9; 49.4 | – | – | SO | Wang 2008 |
Acetylgenistin content | NJRIKY | CIM | 6 | 0 | 6; 43.6 | – | – | SO | Wang 2008 |
Malonylgenistin content | NJRIKY | CIM | 4 | 2; 10.0–11.2; 21.2 | 2; 15.0 | – | – | MS | Wang 2008 |
Genistein content | NJRIKY | CIM | 4 | 1; 13.2; 13.2 | 3; 18.5 | – | – | MS | Wang 2008 |
Genistin content | NJRIKY | CIM | 2 | 0 | 2; 14.5 | – | – | SO | Wang 2008 |
Acetylglycitin content | NJRIKY | CIM | 5 | 0 | 5; 35.2 | – | – | SO | Wang 2008 |
Malonylglycitin content | NJRIKY | CIM | 2 | 0 | 2; 11.0 | – | – | SO | Wang 2008 |
Pop: mapping population; MP: mapping procedure (CIM = composite interval mapping, MCIM = mixed model based CIM); TN: total number of detected QTL; MJ: number of major QTL (number of QTL, range of contribution among QTL and total contribution of QTL included in the column); SM: number of small QTL (number of QTL and total contribution of QTL included in the column); EP: number of epistatic QTL pairs; CU: collective unmapped minor QTL (total contribution in the column); Type: type of QTL constitution (MO: major QTL only; MS: major QTL + small QTL; MSC: major QTL + small QTL + collective unmapped minor QTL; SC: small QTL + collective unmapped minor QTL; SO: small QTL only).
The number in parentheses after a trait is the order of mapping time.