Table 1.  .

Demographics of the Progressing and Non-Progressing Patient Eyes

		Non-progressors	Progressors
No. of eyes (No. of subjects)		210 (148)	36 (33)
Age (yrs.)	Mean (95% CI)	61.4 (59.5, 63.4)	64.7 (61.6, 67.7)
	Median (range)	64.5 (18.1, 85.5)	65.0 (48.3, 83.3)
No. HRT exams	Median (range)	4 (4 to 8)	5 (4 to 8)
HRT follow-up yrs.	Median (range)	3.6 (1.7 to 7.4)	4.1 (2.4, 7.0)
SAP mean deviation at baseline	Mean (95% CI)	−1.72 (−2.16, −1.28)	−3.65 (−5.45, −1.84)
	Median (range)	−0.95 (−30.13, 2.20)	−2.15 (−21.74, 1.72)
SAP PSD at baseline	Mean (95% CI)	2.47 (2.18, 2.76)	4.19 (2.87, 5.51)
	Median (range)	1.73 (0.85, 13.32)	2.30 (0.99, 13.18)
% abnormal disk from photo evaluation at baseline		45.2% (95 of 210 eyes)	77.1% (27 of 35 eyes)*
% abnormal visual field at baseline		32.9% (69 of 210 eyes)	52.8% (19 of 36 eyes)
% of both abnormal disk from photo evaluation and abnormal visual field at baseline		19.5% (41 of 210 eyes)	42.9% (15 of 35 eyes)*

^*One of the eyes that progressed by SAP GPA out of the 36 progressors did not have a baseline stereo-photograph within 6 months from the HRT-II baseline date.