Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul;132(1):533–543. doi: 10.1121/1.4728195

TABLE II.

Comparison of estimated error and standard deviations of attenuation coefficients from two different methods using transducer f/3–5 MHz.

  Phantom A Phantom B
  ABS ERR (%) STD (%) ABS ERR (%) STD (%)
Envelope peak (31PL × 13BW) 10.81 24.18 2.50 20.51
New method (15PL × 15BW) 9.82 20.86 1.28 19.54
New method (30PL × 15BW) 0.25 9.64 0.84 7.20