Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gait Posture. 2012 Apr 23;36(3):430–433. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.027

Table 5.

Multivariable model of the associations of Wii Level, Fitness, Mobility/Balance and Visual variables with the TUG (dependent variable)

β ± SE P
Model 1 Fitness
Step 1 (adjusted R2 = 0.78, p < 0.001)
 BMI 0.01 ± 0.02 0.55
 Gender (0 = Female, 1 = Male) 0.38 ± 0.15 0.02
 Wii Level −0.10 ± 0.10 0.32
 Chair Stand −0.02 ± 0.02 0.17
 Six Min Walk −0.001 ± 0.001 0.44
 Short Ramp 1.30 ± 0.31 0.0003
Step 2
 Wii Level × Chair Stand −0.02 ± 0.03 0.56
 Wii Level × Chair Stand 0.003 ± 0.002 0.10
 Wii Level × Short Ramp 0.64 ± 0.42 0.14

Model 2 Balance/Mobility
Step 1 (adjusted R2 = 0.69, p < 0.001)
 BMI −0.02 ± 0.02 0.26
 Gender (0 = Female, 1 = Male) 0.09 ± 0.17 0.59
 Wii Level −0.06 ± 0.10 0.54
 ABC score −0.04 ± 0.10 0.004
 CT+HITS 0.090 ± 0.01 0.001
Step 2
 Wii Level × ABC score −0.004 ± 0.03 0.88
 Wii Level × CT+HITS 0.02 ± 0.02 0.47

Model 3 Visual
Step 1 (adjusted R2 = 0.03, p =0.33)
 BMI 0.05 ± 0.02 0.05
 Gender (0 = Female, 1 = Male) 0.20 ± 0.33 0.55
 Wii Level −0.19 ± 0.19 0.33
 Divided Attention −0.15 ± 0.17 0.38
Step 2
 Wii Level × Divided Attention 0.12 ± 0.44 0.78