Skip to main content
. 2012 May 24;26(4):349–358. doi: 10.1007/s10557-012-6395-z

Table 1.

Comparison of baseline lipid levels and mean common CIMT progression rates from clinical studies used to calculate the power analysis standard deviation

Study Treatment Mean BaselineLDL-C (mg/dL)a Mean BaselineHDL-C (mg/dL)a Mean Baseline TG (mg/dL)a Treatment Period Duration Mean Common CIMT Change from Baseline, mm (SD)
Taylor et al. (2004) [37]
  Niacin 87 39 154 12 months 0.014 (0.104)
  Placebo 91 40 172 0.044 (0.100)
  Difference −0.03
Sidhu et al. (2004) [44]
  Rosiglitazone 98 45 114 48 weeks −0.012 (0.094)
  Placebo 102 47 137 0.031 (0.096)
  Difference −0.043
Hanefeld et al. (2004) [46]
  Acarbose Not 51 212 ≥36 months 0.007 (0.019)b
  Placebo reported 49 235 0.013 (0.018)b
  Difference −0.006b
Mazzone et al. (2006) [36]
  Pioglitazone 113.8 47.1 178.6 72 weeks −0.001
  Glimepiride 111.3 47.6 170.4 0.012
  Difference −0.013
Hodis et al. (2006) [42]
  Troglitazone 170 50 115 24 months 0.0030 (0.021)b
  Placebo 182 50 115 0.0066 (0.021)b
  Difference −0.0036b
Hedblad et al. (2007) [41]
  Rosiglitazone 135 50 150 12 months 0.01 (0.073)
  Placebo 131 50 150 0.017 (0.076)
  Difference −0.007
Crouse et al. (2007) [34]
  Rosuvastatin 155 50 126 24 months 0.0004 (0.019)b
  Placebo 154 49 134 0.0088 (0.02)b
  Difference −0.0085b
Kastelein et al. (2007) [38]
  Atorvastatin 139 52 97c 24 months −0.0014 (0.027)b
  Atorvastatin + torcetrapib 138 53 97c 0.0038 (0.027)b
  Difference −0.0052b
Kastelein et al. (2008) [43]
  Simvastatin 318 47 160c 24 months 0.0024 (0.077)
  Simvastatin + ezetimibe 319 47 157c 0.0019 (0.079)
  Difference 0.0005
Hiukka et al. (2008) [31]
  Fenofibrate 120 45 136 60 months 0.0050 (0.060)b
  Placebo 118 43 147 0.0069 (0.054)b
  Difference −0.0019b
Meuwese et al. (2009) [35]
  Pactimibe 141 51 135 12 months 0.019 (0.099)d
  Placebo 139 52 136 0.005 (0.085)d
  Difference 0.014
Taylor et al. (2009) [45]
  Ezetimibe 84 43 122c 14 months −0.0007 (0.037)
  Niacin 81 43 126c −0.0142 (0.040)
  Difference 0.0135
Davidson et al. (2009) [40]
  Pomegranate juice 139 55 153 18 months 0.005 (0.048)b
  Control 142 56 144 0.005 (0.048)b
  Difference 0.00b

C cholesterol; CIMT carotid intima-media thickness; HDL high-density lipoprotein; LDL low-density lipoprotein; TG triglyceride

aReported values in mmol/L were converted to mg/dL by dividing cholesterol values by 0.02586 and TG values by 0.01130

bChange per year

cMedian values

dIncluded common, bulb, and internal segments