Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD003711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003711.pub2

Comparison 1.

Herbal medicines versus supportive therapy

Outcome or subgroup title No. of
studies
No. of
participants
Statistical method Effect size
1 Number of patients without
 symptom improvement
4 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
  1.1 Qingxinkangyan Yin
 Decoction versus support
 therapy
1 111 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.12, 1.02]
  1.2 Xinshu Capsule versus
 supportive therapy
1 120 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.14 [0.04, 0.45]
  1.3 Astragaloside injection
 versus support therap
1 164 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.37, 1.59]
  1.4 Shenmai injection versus
 support therapy
1 127 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.14, 0.75]
2 Abnormal ST-T changes 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
  2.1 Shenmai injection versus
 support therapy
1 57 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.58, 2.40]
3 Number of patients died of
 cardiac failure
1 164 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.34, 4.38]
  3.1 Astragaloside injection
 versus support therapy
1 164 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.34, 4.38]
4 Number of patients converting
 to persisting myocarditis
1 164 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.11, 3.79]
  4.1 Astragaloside injection
 versus support therapy
1 164 Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.11, 3.79]
5 Number of patients with
 premature beat
1 120 Odds Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.21 [0.06, 0.79]
  5.1 Xinshu Capsule versus
 supportive therapy
1 120 Odds Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.21 [0.06, 0.79]