Table 3.
Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) | Adjusted odds ratio (OR) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristic: ref. category |
OR (95 % CI) |
P-value |
OR (95 % CI) |
P-value |
Age groupb: <45 years |
1.49 (1.27–1.65) |
<0.001 |
-- |
-- |
Gender: male |
0.93 (0.60 – 1.44) |
0.74 |
-- |
-- |
Years of service |
1.16 (0.95 – 1.43) |
0.15 |
-- |
-- |
Type of job: clinical |
0.72 (0.50 – 1.03) |
0.07 |
0.71 (0.46 – 1.11) |
0.13 |
Childcare: no |
0.91 (0.60 – 1.37) |
0.64 |
-- |
-- |
Eldercare: no |
0.58 (0.36 – 0.94) |
0.02 |
-- |
-- |
Pet care: no |
1.01 (0.66 – 1.55) |
0.95 |
-- |
-- |
Alternative/second | 0.78 (0.47 – 1.32) | 0.35 | -- | -- |
ref = reference, CI = confidence interval, bage group: <45; ≥45; dyears of service class: <1; 2–5; 6–10;10+. Clinical: clinical = (nursing, other clinical, physician), nonclinical = (fiscal/administrative, support staff). The odds ratio for willingness to report to work among the types of jobs was adjusted for age group, gender, years of service, type of job, childcare, eldercare, pet care and alternative/second job. †Indicates a significant predictor, P < 0.05. Multivariable logistic regression model yielded an adequate fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow test chi-square = 11.3, P = 0.185).