Skip to main content
. 2012 May 24;7(8):1310–1319. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00260112

Table 1.

Comparisons between patients who had or had not undergone an allograft nephrectomy

Parameters Patients with an Allograft Nephrectomy (Group I; n=48) Patients with a Clinically Indicated Allograft Nephrectomy (n=31) Patients with a Systematic Allograft Nephrectomy (n=17) Patients without an Allograft Nephrectomy: (Group II; n=21)
Recipient age at transplantation (years) 38.6±16 40.3±17 35.6±14 34.6±11
Recipient sex: male (%) 35 (72.9) 22 (71) 13 (76) 19 (90)
Donor age (years) 39.6±18.7 43.4±18 36±17 40.3±15
Type of donor: deceased (%) 47 (98) 30 (97) 17 (100) 21 (100)
Number of previous transplantations 1.27±0.57 1.22±0.42 1.35±0.79 1.38±0.59
Nephrectomy for previous kidney transplantation (%) 9/11 (81.8) 7/7 (100) 2/4 (50) 4/7 (57.1)
Number of HLA A/B/DR/DQ mismatches 3.98±1.83 4.03±2.02 3.88±1.45 3.5±1.8
Number of HLA A/B mismatches 2.45±1.05 2.38±1.11 2.59±0.94 2.1±1.27
Number of HLA DR/DQ mismatches 1.48±1.24 1.64±1.35 1.17±0.95 1.57±0.87
Patients with DSAs at transplantation 0 0 0 0
Induction therapy: yes (%) 39 (81.3) 25 (81) 14 (82) 18 (85.7)
Polyclonal ab/anti–IL-2R induction therapy 24/15a 15/10 9/5 17/1a
Rituximab induction therapy: yes (%) 1 (2) 1 (3) 0 0
Initial immunosuppression after transplantation: CNIs (%) 47 (97.8) 30 (97) 17 (100) 20 (95)
Cyclosporine A/tacrolimus (%) 31 (66)/16 (34) 22 (70)/8 (30) 9 (53)/8 (47) 19 (89.4)/2 (10.6)
 mTOR inhibitors (%) 4 (8.9) 3 (9.5) 1 (6) 1 (5)
 MPA (%) 32 (66.7) 21 (67.8) 11 (60) 17 (83)
 steroids (%) 48 (100) 31 (100) 17 (100) 21 (100)
Immunosuppression at graft loss 38 (79.1)
 CNIs (%) 10 (26.3)/28 (73.7) 25 (80.6) 13 (76.5) 16 (75)
 cyclosporine A/tacrolimus (%) 4 (9) 6 (24)/19 (76) 4 (31)/9 (69) 9 (53)/7 (47)
 mTOR inhibitors (%) 36 (75) 1 (3) 3 (17) 2 (9)
 MPA (%) 43 (89.6) 23 (77.4) 13 (82) 17 (81)
 steroids (%) 30 (93.5) 15 (88) 21 (100)
Rejection episodes during the transplant period (%) 27 (56) 18 (58) 9 (53) 12 (55)
Number of rejection episodes per patient 1 (0–4) 1 (0–4) 1 (0–2) 1 (0–2)
Steroid-sensitive rejection episodes (%) 16 (33.5) 13 (42) 3 (18) 10 (48)
Number of steroid-sensitive episodes per patient 0 (0–2) 0 (0–2) 0 (0–1) 0 (0–2)
Steroid-resistant rejection episodes (%) 15 (31) 9 (29) 6 (41) 4 (20)
Humoral rejection episodes (%) 6 (12.5) 4 (12.9) 2 (11.7) 3 (14.2)
Rituximab use during transplant period: yes (%) 11 (23) 8 (26) 3 (18) 6 (28.5)
Number of Rituximab injections/patientb 2 (2–5) 3 (2–5) 2 2
Time between last Rituximab and graft failure (days) 410 (20–1740) 330 (120–870) 596 (20–1740) 405 (60–2160)
Time between last Rituximab therapy and nephrectomy (days) 581 (95–1800) 498 (180–1050) 800 (31–1800)
Plasma exchange during transplant period: yes (%) 7 (14.6) 6 (19) 1 (6) 6 (28.5)
Number of plasma exchanges during the transplant period 9 (5–14)a 9 (5–14) 12 6c
Time between transplantation and graft failure (days) 1768 (81–7785) 1340 (81–7351) 3330 (80–7785) 4099 (493–10013)
Time between graft failure and graft nephrectomy (days) 150 (100–3390) 169 (100–3390) 143 (110–1119)
Time between graft failure and last follow-up (days) 680 (111–3939) 696 (111–3939) 673 (137–1436) 836 (33–3018)
Number of patients with DSAs at graft failure (%) 6 (12.5) 4 (12.9) 2 (11.7) 3 (14.2)
Number of patients with DSAs at graft nephrectomy (%) 17 (35.4) 10 (32.2) 7 (41.2)
Number of patients with DSAs at last follow-up (%) 39 (81)a 25 (80.6) 14 (82.3) 11 (52.4)c
Time between nephrectomy and de novo DSA (days) 5 (5–1097) 5 (5–1097) 5 (5–270)
a

HLA, human leukocyte antigen; DSA, donor-specific antibodies; CNIs, calcineurin inhibitors; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; MPA, mycophenolic acid.

b

The Rituximab dose of each injection was 375 mg/m2.

c

P<0.05.