Table 2. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of reporting greater condom use (never, sometimes/half, mostly/always) among men with regular partners (N = 1,998).

	Unadjusted		Adjusted
	Odds Ratio	95% CI	Odds Ratio	95% CI
Sociodemographic factors
Age (continuous)	0.91***	0.90–0.92	0.95***	0.94–0.97
Location
Rural	1	(ref)	–
Urban	1.78***	1.47–2.16	–
Occupation
Professional	1	(ref)	1	(ref)
Skilled technical	0.33***	0.25–0.44	0.63*	0.45–0.87
Sales/service	0.58***	0.42–0.79	0.74	0.53–1.04
Labor	0.29***	0.20–0.42	0.51*	0.34–0.77
Unemployed	1.68**	1.16–2.44	1.00	0.65–1.53
Risk perception factors
Education
Less than grade 4	1	(ref)	1	(ref)
Grade 5–7	2.88***	1.91–4.34	1.32	0.84–2.07
Junior high school	6.73***	4.52–10.03	2.23***	1.44–3.57
Senior high school	8.40***	5.68–12.41	2.61***	1.67–4.09
Vocational/BA or higher	13.04***	8.70–19.55	4.54***	2.86–7.20
Marital status
Unmarried	1	(ref)	1	(ref)
Married & registered	0.10***	0.08–0.13	0.30***	0.22–0.42
Married, not registered	0.16***	0.12–0.21	0.33***	0.24–0.45
More than one partner in past 12 months	2.99***	2.29–3.89	–
Ever gave money for sex
No	1	(ref)	–
Yes – more than a year ago	0.70**	0.57–0.87
Yes – within the past year	2.64***	1.78–3.93
Duration of relationship
More than 90 days	1	(ref)	1	(ref)
31–90 days	1.21	0.92–1.59	0.83	0.61–1.13
30 days or less	0.87	0.68–1.31	0.68**	0.51–0.91
Condom motivation factors
Self-reported access to convenient & cheap condoms	0.81*	0.66–1.00	–
Unprompted knowledge of condom effectiveness in HIV prevention	2.35***	1.87–2.95	1.41*	1.09–1.81
Condom use as chosen strategy to reduce HIV risk	2.25***	1.85–2.74	1.38*	1.10–1.72

^*p<0.05

^**p<0.01

^***p<0.001.