Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 22;2012:216390. doi: 10.1155/2012/216390

Table 2.

Logistic regression of factors predicting the presence of oesophageal varices or large oesophageal varices.

beta (SE) Adjusted OR (95% CI) P
Factors predicting OV
 Gender −2.5 (0.7) 0.003
 Male 1
 Female 0.1 (0.02–0.3)
 Platelet count (cell/mm3) 2.5 (0.7) 0.0003
 ≥93000 1
 <93000 12.4 (3.2–47.7)
 Spleen size (mm) 0.04 (0.01) 1.04 (1.01–1.07) 0.002
Factors predicting large OV
 Gender −2.1 (0.6) 0.001
 Male 1
 Female 0.1 (0.03–0.4)
 Platelet count (cell/mm3) 1.4 (0.5) 0.01
 ≥93000 1
 <93000 4.0 (1.4–11.72)
 Spleen size (mm) 0.04 (0.01) 1.05 (1.02–1.1) <0.0001
 Child-Pugh score <0.0001
 Class A 1
 Class B −1.6 (0.8) 0.2 (0.04–0.9)
 Class C −0.7 (0.8) 0.5 (0.1–2.3)

Intercept of model predicting OV = −4.2, C-index: 0.878, R 2 = 0.31, P < 0.0001.

Intercept of model predicting LOV = −4.2, C-index: 0.850, R 2 = 0.30, P < 0.0001.

Beta: coefficient estimates, OR: odds ratio, SE: standard error, CI: confidence interval.

Platelet count dichotomized by the median value because of large value of coefficient estimates of platelet count (−10-5) when used as continuous variable not corrected by the exact method, Logistic regression analysis was computed on 110 patients due to one missing value in those with no OV.