Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 May 15;62(3):1761–1768. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.020

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The rRMSE of model II to OLS for each estimated coefficient (βr,βf,β1) are plotted as a function of the ratio of the true standard deviations, σx,r:σy (A), the number of random regressors, Xr(j) (B) and the accuracy of the ratio estimate (C). (Note, y-axis were visually optimized for each figure and are not common across A, B, and C.) With increasing σx,r:σy ratios, model II regression has increased relative accuracy in βr estimates compared to OLS with increasing σx,r:σy ratios. In (C), the estimated ratio of σx,r:σy was allowed to deviate from the simulated value,σx,r:σy = 1. The common simulation shared in (A, B, C) is indicated by a gray line.