Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 May 15;62(3):1761–1768. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.020

Table 1.

Comparison of methods based on simulated imaging data

Outside (β=0) Inside Caudate (β=1.5) Inside Putamen (β=−0.6)
FPR (%) RMSE FNR (%) RMSE FNR (%) RMSE
OLS 0.1±0.008 0.05±0.0001 0 0.24±0.003 1.7±0.2 0.12 ±0.0015
RC 0.1± 0.006 0.06±0.008 0.04±0.05 0.11±0.002 1.5±0.2 0.08± 0.001
Model II 0.07± 0.006 0.06±0.002 0 0.13±0.004 0.2±0.09 0.09± 0.001

The significance is calculated according to an uncorrected p-value, p<0.001.