Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 May 24;62(3):1848–1856. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.041

Table 1.

Comparison of MR atlases

Year Reference Field Contrast Slice mm In Plane mm Voxel mm3 Relative1
1987 (Johnson, 1987) 1.5 T1 1.2 0.115×0.115 0.016 1025
1992 (Ting, 1992) 4.7 T1, T2, PD 0.6 0.175×175 0.018 1177
2003 (Leergaard, 2003) 3.0 T1 0.39 0.390×0.390 0.059 3782
2003 (Schweinhardt, 2003) 4.7 T1, T2 0.5 0.117×0.117 0.007 448
2004 (Cross, 2004) 1.5 T1 0.5 0.273×250 0.034 2179
2006 (Ramu, 2006) 7.0 T2 1.0 0.137×0.137 0.019 1203
2006 (Schwarz, 2006) 4.7 T2 1.0 0.156×0.156 0.024 1538
2007 (Hjornevik, 2007) 3.0 T1 0.195 0.195×0.195 0.007 449
2010 (Nie, 2010) 7.0 T2 0.3 0.14×0.14 0.00588 377
2010 (Lu, 2010) 9.4 T2 1.0 0.137×0.137 0.0187 1199
2011 (Veraart, 2011) 7.0 T1, DTI 0.088 0.088×0.088 0.00068 44
2012 This work 7.0 T2*, DTI 0.025 0.025×0.025 0.0000156 1
1

The resolution is normalized to this work by dividing the encoding voxel volume by 0.0000156, i.e. the volume of the voxels in our gradient recalled echo (GRE) image.