Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 31;7(7):e41889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041889

Table 4. Comparison of biochemical parameters between NFG and IFG group.

Parameters/Group NFG (n = 76) IFG (n = 47) p value
FPG (mmol/L) 4.59±0.48 6.1±0.47 <0.001
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.55±0.66 4.89±0.71 0.009
Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.28±0.46 1.64±0.56 <0.001
HDL-c (mmol/L) 1.01±0.13 0.99±0.08 0.552
LDL-c (mmol/L) 2.95±0.58 3.14±0.56 0.044
VLDL-c (mmol/L) 0.59±0.22 0.76±0.26 <0.001
Insulin (µU/L) 13.39±7.25 15.31±4.78 0.006
IR 2.74±1.53 4.16±1.37 <0.001
TBARS (µmol/L) 3.34±0.72 3.61±0.58 0.020
TAC (µmol/L) 1.88±0.69 1.36±0.45 <0.001
Hs-CRP (µg/mL) 4.18±2.58 5.86±2.67 0.001
TNF-α (pg/mL) 61.33±21.28 90.25±24.62 <0.001

Data are expressed as Mean ± standard deviation; HDL-c, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-c, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL-c, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol; IR, insulin resistance; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; hs-CRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; TNF-α-tumor necrosis factor alpha; p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant.