Table 4.
Mean differences in speech perception scores (D%) assessed with different voice over Internet protocol qualities (degree of packet loss) versus conventional telephone quality using the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser (HSM) Sentence Test.
| Participant group |
SNR (dB)a |
Packet loss | |||||||
| None (0%) | Mild (5%) | Medium (10%) | Severe (20%) | ||||||
| D% | P value | D% | P value | D% | P value | D% | P value | ||
| CIb users | 0 | +2 | NAc | +1 | NA | +2 | NA | +2 | NA |
| 5 | +21 | .002d | +11 | .01d | +9 | .008d | +1 | .81 | |
| 10 | +36 | .001d | +34 | .002d | +30 | .002d | +4 | .04e | |
| 15 | +36 | .001d | +23 | .01e | +25 | .006d | +6 | .25 | |
| Quiet | +16 | .001d | +16 | .002d | +16 | .002d | –1 | .92 | |
| HAf users | 0 | +4 | .16 | +2 | .69 | +0 | >.99 | –1 | .02e |
| 5 | +18 | .002d | +4 | .56 | +6 | .38 | –6 | .16 | |
| 10 | +16 | .003d | +9 | .08 | +4 | .32 | –12 | .02e | |
| 15 | +6 | .004d | –4 | .65 | –7 | .25 | –17 | .004d | |
| Quiet | +2 | .16 | –1 | .31 | –1 | .56 | –7 | .004d | |
| NHAg | 0 | +53 | .001d | +46 | .002d | +33 | .002d | +22 | .002d |
| 5 | +17 | .003d | +16 | .002d | +16 | .004d | –3 | .49 | |
| 10 | +1 | .21 | +3 | .06 | +1 | .47 | –6 | .009d | |
| 15 | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | –1 | NA | –1 | >.99 | |
| Quiet | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | –1 | NA | –1 | NA | |
a Signal to noise ratio.
b Cochlear implant.
c Not applicable.
d Statistically significant with Bonferroni correction.
e Statistically significant without Bonferroni correction.
f Hearing aid.
g Normal-hearing adults.