Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Jun 6;32(8):1372–1379. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00708.x

Table 3.

Models of Perceived Access

FORMAL INFORMAL

b t b t
Individual level variables:

 Off-premise outlets within 2 miles 0.081 *** 3.79 0.004 0.04

 Available spending money 0.002 * 2.16 0.004 * 2.03
 Mobility indicator 0.063 1.35 0.613 *** 4.39
 Average age of close friends 0.023 0.98 0.341 *** 3.81
 Past year parental drinking 0.001 0.02 0.747 *** 4.47

 Deviance scale 0.106 *** 4.32 0.647 *** 8.52
 Conventionality scale -0.024 -0.88 -0.561 *** -5.19

 % Male -0.012 -0.58 -0.139 -1.67
 Age 0.058 1.25 0.298 * 2.24
 Hispanic -0.055 -1.77 -0.179 -1.63
 African-American -0.053 -0.70 -0.476 * -2.04
 Asian or Pacific Islander 0.092 0.96 0.165 0.67

Aggregate (zipcode) level variables:

 % Hispanic 0.003 ** 3.10 -0.007 -1.46
 % African American 0.002 0.80 0.001 0.16
 % Asian or Pacific Islander 0.005 * 2.41 -0.003 -0.33
 Population density 0.000 0.34 0.000 0.93
 % owner occupied 0.005 1.55 0.001 0.06
 Median HH Income 0.000 0.61 0.000 -0.86
 Intercept -1.454 *** -51.73 -3.316 *** -34.45

Results are based on hierarchical linear regression analyses of 1,419 persons nested within 50 zip codes; perceived ease of formal access outcome measure is based on a single survey item ranging from -2 to 2; perceived ease of informal access is the sum of four survey items, so outcome measure has a possible range of -8 to 8; exogenous variables are grand-mean centered;

***

p <= .001,

**

p <= .01,

*

p <= .05