Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: Biopolymers. 2011;96(1):103–110. doi: 10.1002/bip.21495

Table 3.

Opioid receptor affinities and efficacy of [NMePhe1]arodyn analogs where position 3 was substituted with other aromatic and non-aromatic amino acids

X-NMePhe-Phe-R-Arg-Leu-Arg-Arg-D-Ala-Arg-Pro-Lys-NH2

Peptide X R Ki ± SEM (nM) Ki ratio
(μ/κ)
AC
% control
@ 10 μMa
κ μ
5 CH3OCO Phe 4.93 ± 0.15 1750 ± 100 355 74 ± 13
9 CH3OCO Trp 9.52 ± 1.73 1280 ± 280 134 98 ± 13
13 CH3OCO Tyr 5.80 ± 1.27 1300 ± 340 224 58 ± 10
14 CH3OCO Nal(2′) 24.4 ± 7.2 53.8 ± 13.1 2 109 ± 10
15 CH3OCO Cha 3.60 ± 0.21 818 ± 253 227 55 ± 18
2 b Ac Phe 4.56 ± 0.45 5056 ± 790 1100 86 ± 1
3 Ac Trp 13.0 ± 2.6 2990 ± 700 230 105 ± 16
16 Ac Tyr 37.3 ± 16.0 3370 ± 570 90 52 ± 11
17 Ac Nal(2′) 27.0 ± 7.3 121 ± 35 4.5 101 ± 11
18 Ac Cha 7.85 ± 2.74 5930 ±1920 755 52 ± 6
a

Relative to the full agonist Dyn A (1-13)NH2 (0% control, 100% inhibition).

b

From reference 30.