Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 3;7(8):e42604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042604

Table 2. Difference in leaf area between fresh and treated leaves of ten species and the respective percent decrease in area.

Species Treatment Difference in leaf area (cm2) Decrease in area (%)
Acer saccharum Pressed −3.94±0.37 * 6.86±0.29
Cold 0.03±0.06 −0.09±0.13
Asclepias syriaca Pressed −5.87±0.56 * 10.13±1.13
Cold −0.09±0.07 0.05±0.10
Avena sativa Pressed −4.43±0.38 * 20.68±1.08
Cold −0.82±0.17 * 3.58±0.73
Phragmites australis Pressed −7.07±0.93 * 24.76±1.17
Cold −0.31±0.20 0.87±0.73
Picea pungens Pressed −0.08±0.01 * 21.06±2.12
Cold −0.05±0.01 * 15.37±1.97
Pinus strobus Pressed −0.08±0.01 * 16.94±1.58
Cold −0.06±0.01 * 11.41±2.06
Polypodium virginianum Pressed −8.78±0.69 * 35.22±1.92
Cold 0.03±0.15 −0.25±0.65
Pteridium aquilinum Pressed −5.07±0.50 * 13.94±0.59
Cold −0.35±0.10 * 0.98±0.26
Quercus rubra Pressed −4.82±0.42 * 7.18±0.25
Cold 0.03±0.05 −0.14±0.15
Taraxacum officinale Pressed −4.74±0.29 * 25.99±0.79
Cold −0.92±0.18 * 4.11±0.77

Asterisks denote differences between fresh and treated leaf areas that were significantly different than zero (paired t-test, P≤0.05, n = 25).