Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Health. 2012 Aug;60(6):449–459. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2012.673523

Table 1.

Means, Standard Deviations, Frequencies, and Bivariate Correlations

M (SD) or Frequencies 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1. PSUS 2.41 (.83) --
2. PSEV 3.51 (.93) .05 --
3. PEFF 4.16 (.87) .06 .25** --
4. PVREF 3.73 (.85) .15 .37** .48** --
5. PINT 4.16 (.97) .20* .19 .77** .60** --
6. SSUS 2.12 (.86) .23* −.02 .05 .13 .13 --
7. SSEV 3.64 (.91) −.01 −.15 −.03 −.16 −.08 −.02 --
8. SEFF 3.00 (1.2) −.18 −.01 .11 .03 .02 .06 .14 --
9. SVREF 3.64 (.57) −.15 .10 .17 −.01 .15 .07 .05 .07 --
10. SINT 3.21 (1.0) .12 .04 .13 .11 .17 .48** .04 .44** .04 --
11. SVAC 3.08 (.73) .07 −.08 .16 .02 .11 .24* .12 .28** .11 .44** --
12. GW n = 96 (no); n = 14 (yes) .02 −.08 −.02 .09 .02 .13 −.20* .27** −.16 .27** .12 --
13. STI n = 89 (no); n = 5 (yes) .20 −.03 −.10 −.04 .03 .34** −.04 .09 −.09 .21* .20 .34** --
14. RELIG n = 50 (no); n = 61 (yes) −.01 .08 −.06 −.06 −.20* −.13 .16 .12 −.08 −.13 .02 .07 .14 --
*

p < .05,

**

p < .01

Note: Variables 1–10 are based on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Variable 11 is based on a 4-point scale (1 = very unlikely to 4 = very likely). Variables 12, 13, and 14 were dichotomous (0 = no, 1 = yes). PSUS = parents’ susceptibility, PSEV = parents’ severity, PEFF = parents’ self-efficacy, PVREF = parents’ vaccine response efficacy, PINT = parents’ intention to talk to son, SSUS = sons’ susceptibility, SSEV = sons’ severity, SEFF = sons’ self-efficacy, SVREF = sons’ vaccine response efficacy, SINT = sons’ intention to talk to a healthcare practitioner, SVAC = sons’ likelihood of receiving the vaccine, GW = whether sons have heard of a shot or vaccine that prevents genital warts, STI = whether sons have heard about sexually transmitted infections from a healthcare provider, RELIG = sons’ religious membership.