Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012 Jul 9;424(3):493–496. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.06.141

Table 1.

Local and global flexibility of tropomyosin. Flexibility determined from MD simulations of either isolated tropomyosin molecules or tropomyosin when bound to F-actin [5,8,13]. (D175N was not studied on F-actin, since MD runs of actin-tropomyosin are extremely expensive.) δ measures true flexibility as the mean deviation angle (see Fig. S1) from the time-averaged position between the two ends of a given segment of the rod [5,8,13].

Tropomyosin examined
δ - F-actin-free tropomyosin (°)
δ - Tropomyosin bound to F-actin (°)
Wild-type
Local δ - at residue 175 4.45 ± 0.05 3.59 ± 0.19
Local δ - at residue 180 4.21 ± 0.05 3.60 ± 0.21
δ over entire tropomyosin 22.0 ± 1.9 9.89 ± 0.11
D175N
Local δ - at residue 175 4.39 ± 0.02 --
Local δ - at residue 180 5.86 ± 0.08* --
δ over entire tropomyosin 30.5 ± 0.19* --
E180G
Local δ - at residue 175 4.47 ± 0.09 3.85 ± 0.01
Local δ - at residue 180 5.30 ± 0.08* 4.94 ± 0.30*
δ over entire tropomyosin 27.6 ± 1.3* 10.9 ± 0.50*

Local δ: segment is taken over 9 residues centered at either residue 175 or 180. δ over entire tropomyosin: segment is the whole tropomyosin.

*

p<0.01 compared to wild-type; error of corresponding half-data sets reported.