Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;119(6):1157–1163. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824e9f2f

Table 2.

Multivariable Logistic Regression on the Association of Receiving a Repeat Pap Test Compared With Colposcopy Among Women Ages 18–20 With Minimally Abnormal Pap Tests (Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance Human Papillomavirus +) (n=206*

Characteristic Preguideline Postguideline Univariable,
Unadjusted
Multivariable,
Adjusted
Multivariable,
Adjusted
n=131 n=75 OR (95%
CI)
OR (95%
CI)
Wald Χ2P-
value
Total
n
Percent
Receiving Repeat
Pap
Total
n
Percent
Receiving
Repeat
Pap
Date of
Abnormal
Pap Finding
(LSIL/ ASC-
US HPV+)
Preguideline
Date (ref)
131 22% 0 0% - - -
Postguideline
Date
0 0% 75 55% 4.24 (2.30 --
7.84)
10.22 (4.37 --
23.88)
[lt].0001
Site of care
A 26 0% 18 17% 0.08 (0.02 --
0.27)
0.07 (0.01 --
0.37)
0.002
B (ref) 44 30% 21 90% - - -
C 12 33% 6 100% 1.29 (0.45 --
3.68)
1.77 (0.48--
6.50)
0.39
D 13 8% 10 20% 0.16 (0.04 --
0.57)
0.07 (0.01 --
0.33)
[lt]0.01
E 13 23% 10 60% 0.66 (0.25 --
1.75)
0.77 (0.17 --
3.56)
0.74
F 23 35% 10 50% 0.67 (0.29 --
1.57)
1.02 (0.34 --
3.11)
0.97
Insurance
status
Uninsured 40 23% 19 53% 0.80 (0.41 --
1.58)
1.54 (0.66 --
3.60)
0.32
Public (ref) 62 23% 40 60% - - -
Private 29 21% 16 44% 0.68 (0.32 --
1.46)
0.57 (0.21 --
1.56)
0.28
Language
English (ref) 110 26% 62 55% - - -
Spanish Other 14 7% 7 14% 0.18 (0.04 --
0.80)
0.60 (0.08 --
4.58)
0.63
7 0% 6 100% 0.98 (0.28 --
3.49)
0.97 (0.24 --
4.01)
0.97
Race or ethnicity
Hispanic 32 13% 18 28% 0.28 (0.12 --
0.63)
0.34 (0.09 --
1.25)
0.10
Black (ref) 66 30% 29 76% - - -
White 26 19% 24 42% 0.54 (0.26 --
1.12)
0.64 (0.18 --
2.27)
0.49
Other 7 0% 4 100% 0.72 (0.20 --
2.63)
1.36 (0.23 --
7.93)
0.73

LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; ASC-US, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; HPV, human papillomavirus.

*

44 patients were excluded from analysis due to missing diagnostic data (eg, lost to follow-up), and 14 were excluded because their index Pap test was HSIL.

All variables are included in multivariable analysis: date of abnormal finding, site of care, insurance status, language and race or ethnicity.