Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;173:543–548.

Table: 1.

Criteria to be included in the
new cross-institutional scale
(ranked by > 70% of
participants as "very
important" or "important.
% participants that ranked
criterion as "very important"
or "important"
Type of Assessment for Quantification of the
metric
1. Maintains visibility (of
tool) while removing bone
100% Contextual/Procedural
2. Selects appropriate burr
type and size
98.4% Contextual
3. Antrum entered 98.4% % of structure (volume violated)
4. No violation of facial
nerve sheath
98.3% Proximity - % of volume structure violated
5. Sigmoid sinus is not
entered
96.7% % of volume of structure violated
6. Identifies tympanic
segment of the facial nerve
96.6% % correlated with expert removal

Procedural
7. Does not drill on ossicle 91.8% Proximity - % of volume of structure violated
8. Firm, low, good hand
position and grip on drill
91.8% Procedural
9. Does not use excessive
drill force near critical
structures
91.8% Procedural

Proximity
10. Identifies the chorda
tympani or stump
91.7% % correlated with expert removal

Procedural
11. Drills in best direction
(clear understanding of
cutting edge)
90.2% Procedural/Contextual
12. Canal wall up (EAC) 89.8% % correlated with expert removal
13. Identifies the facial nerve
at the cochlearform process
88.1% % correlated with expert removal
14. Appropriate depth of
cavity (Cortex)
88% % correlated with expert removal
15. Drills with broad strokes 86.9% Procedural/Contextual

Technique
16. No holes in EAC 86.4% % of volume of structure violated
17. Complete saucerization
(Cortex)
83.3% % correlated with expert removal
18. Posterior canal wall
thinned
81.4% % of volume of structure violated
19. Facial recess completely
exposed (overlying bone
sufficiently thinned so nerve
can be seen, located and
safely avoided)
80.4% % correlated with expert removal
20. Identifies the facial nerve
at the external genu
79.3% % correlated with expert removal Procedural
21. Low frequency of drill
"jumps" (jumps defined as
drilling further than 1 cm
from previous spot)
77% Procedural (localization of tool)
22. No holes in tegmen 73.8% % of volume of structure violated
23. Use of diamond burr within
2 mm of facial nerve
73.3% Proximity/Localization

Procedural
24. No cells remain on
sinodural angle
72.5% % correlated with expert removal
25. Sinodural angle sharply
defined
71.2% % correlated with expert removal

Categories of Metrics:

Contextual = Contingent on Sequence (Steps)

Technique = Speed, force, angle, etc.

Localization = Position of tool

Proximity = Distance of tool to structure (s)

Violation = % of structure (volume) removed

Identified = % correlated with expert removal