Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 15;12(3):336–343. doi: 10.12816/0003148

Table 3:

Correspondence analysis by gender of items with the highest mean score in each factor (subscale)

(Factor) Item *Percentage responding (n)
Males n = 58 Females n = 67
(Motivation) TBL strategy motivated me to study harder 82.3 (48) 68.4 (46)
(Teamwork) Discussion during GRATs helped me comprehend better 58.6 (34) 67.1 (45)
(Learning objectives) I was able to achieve the learning objectives set 79.3 (46) 88.1 (59)
(Knowledge Application) TBL promoted understanding rather than memorisation 81.0 (47) 76.1 (51)
(Facilitation) The duration of the TBL session was just right 81.0 (47) 85.0 (57)
*

Percentage of students who responded ‘agree’ or ‘strongly agree’ Legend: TBL = team-based learning; GRAT =group readiness assurance test.