Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 7;7(8):e40710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040710

Figure 1. Up and Down states and Up-and-Down transitions in two different network models.

Figure 1

(A) Model A (mean-field model) [18]: time-series for the membrane potential, Inline graphic. Observe the presence of two steady states lower one around Inline graphic mV (Down-state/blue curve) and a larger one (Up state/green curve) at about Inline graphic mV; these two are obtained for low noise amplitudes (Inline graphic mVInline graphic, Inline graphic Inline graphic) and different initial conditions. Instead, the Up-and-Down state (red curve), corresponds to a high noise amplitude (Inline graphic, Inline graphic). Note that, typically the Up-state intervals start with an abrupt spike which parallels empirical observations as discussed in [18]. Parameters have been fixed as in [18]: Inline graphic s, Inline graphic s, Inline graphic mV/Hz, Inline graphic, Inline graphic mV, Inline graphic mV, and Inline graphic Hz/mV. (B) Model B (network of spiking neurons) [21]: Time series of membrane potential. Curves and color code are as for Model A. For Inline graphic the system exhibits Up-and-Down transitions, for larger (smaller) values as Inline graphic (Inline graphic), it remains steadily in the Up (Down) state. Parameters have been fixed as in [21]: vesicles per synapsis Inline graphic, resting potential Inline graphic mV, membrane threshold Inline graphic mV, capacitance Inline graphic pF, leakage characteristic time Inline graphic s, synaptic recovery time Inline graphic s, signal time decay Inline graphic s, refractory period Inline graphic s, input amplitudes Inline graphic pA, Inline graphic pA, and external driving rate Inline graphic Hz.