Table 2.
HRRs 2 SDs Above and Below the Unadjusted Mean Oxygen Utilization Rate and the Adjusted Mean Oxygen Utilization Odds Ratio
| Unadjusted % Using Oxygen | N | |
|---|---|---|
| HRR unadjusted oxygen utilization rate >2 SDs above the mean HRR | ||
| oxygen utilization rate | ||
| Ogden, UT | 76.0 | 25 |
| Pueblo, CO | 76.0 | 25 |
| Idaho Falls, ID | 71.4 | 21 |
| Casper, WY | 63.9 | 36 |
| Fort Collins, CO | 62.5 | 32 |
| Greeley, CO | 62.5 | 32 |
| Colorado Springs, CO | 62.1 | 66 |
| Amarillo, TX | 60.7 | 84 |
| Traverse City, MI | 60.7 | 28 |
| Salt Lake City, UT | 59.7 | 119 |
| HRR unadjusted oxygen utilization rate >2 SDs below the mean HRR | ||
| oxygen utilization rate | ||
| Harlingen, TX | 14.8 | 54 |
| New Brunswick, NJ | 13.7 | 102 |
| Lafayette, LA | 12.0 | 92 |
| Grand Forks, ND | 11.4 | 35 |
| HRR adjusted* odds ratio for oxygen utilization >2 SDs above the mean HRR odds ratio | ||
| Ogden, UT | 76.0 | 25 |
| Pueblo, CO | 76.0 | 25 |
| Idaho Falls, ID | 71.4 | 21 |
| Amarillo, TX | 60.7 | 84 |
| Traverse City, MI | 60.7 | 28 |
| Lakeland, FL | 53.2 | 62 |
| La Crosse, WI | 53.1 | 32 |
| Saginaw, MI | 51.9 | 104 |
| Flint, MI | 50.0 | 88 |
| Grand Rapids, MI | 50.0 | 114 |
| Olympia, WA | 50.0 | 30 |
| South Bend, IN | 47.5 | 99 |
| Redding, CA | 46.9 | 49 |
| Cape Girardeau, MO | 46.7 | 45 |
| HRR adjusted* odds ratio for oxygen utilization >2 SDs below the mean HRR odds ratio | ||
| None | ||
*
Multiple logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race, number of admissions, Charlson comorbidity index, elevation, and ZIP code-based median household income.