Table 2. Results for four multilevel regression models of the single overall rating of a proposal across Year of Decision × Main Disciplines.
Null model | Random intercept + female reviewer/female applicant | Random intercept/slope + female reviewer/female applicant | Random intercept + female reviewer/female applicant + applicant’s age | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Term | Est. Par. | Est. | SE | Est. | SE | Est. | SE | Est. | SE | ||||
Notes. Est. Par. = parameter, Est. = estimated parameter value, SE = standard error, −2LogL = deviance, BIC = Schwarz Bayesian information criterion; N = 23,977 reviews. *p < .05 (t-test; t-value and degrees of freedom are not reported), †p < .05 (Wald test). | |||||||||||||
Fixed effects | |||||||||||||
Intercept | β0 | 81.65* | 0.27 | 81.86* | 0.28 | 81.86* | 0.28 | 81.79* | 0.28 | ||||
Female reviewer | β1 | −0.34 | 0.33 | −0.34 | 0.33 | −0.34 | 0.33 | ||||||
Female applicant | β2 | −1.08* | 0.35 | −1.08* | 0.35 | −0.96* | 0.36 | ||||||
Female Reviewer × Female Applicant | β3 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.68 | ||||||
Applicant’s age | β4 | 0.04* | 0.01 | ||||||||||
Applicant’s Age × Female Reviewer | β5 | −0.001 | 0.03 | ||||||||||
Applicant’s Age × Female Applicant | β6 | −0.01 | 0.04 | ||||||||||
Random effects | |||||||||||||
Year × Discipline u0j | σ2u0 | 12.35† | 1.60 | 12.44† | 1.61 | 12.44† | 1.62 | 12.08† | 1.59 | ||||
u1j | σ2u1 | 0.00 | – | ||||||||||
u2j | σ2u2 | 0.00 | – | ||||||||||
u3j | σ2u3 | 0.00 | – | ||||||||||
Proposal εk(j) | σ2ε(j) | 51.73† | 2.08 | 51.55† | 2.08 | 51.55† | 2.08 | 51.40† | 2.08 | ||||
εi(j k) | σ2ε | 181.41† | 2.10 | 181.41† | 2.10 | 181.41† | 2.10 | 181.50† | 2.10 | ||||
−2LogL | 194 566.6 | 194 556.4 | 194 556.4 | 194 286.0 | |||||||||
BIC | 194 588.6 | 194 594.8 | 194 594.8 | 194 340.9 |