Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 1;87(2):281–291. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0106

Table 6.

Estimated true prevalence of pig cysticercosis (Taenia solium, T. hydatigena, and T. asiatica) and dog taeniasis (T. hydatigena) adjusted by the maximum-likelihood estimation model for increments of test sensitivity, assuming specificity of 100%, Laos*

Test sensitivity (%) Estimated true prevalence of pig cysticercosis, % (95% CI) Estimated true prevalence of T. hydatigena taeniasis in village dogs, % (95% CI)
T. solium T. hydatigena T. asiatica
100 0.8 (0.1–1.6) 22.4 (19.0–25.7) 0.2 (0.0–0.5) 1.9 (0.0–4.5)
90 0.9 (0.1–1.8) 24.9 (21.1–28.6) 0.2 (0.0–0.6) 2.1 (0.0–5.0)
80 1.1 (0.1–2.0) 28.0 (23.8–32.2) 0.2 (0.0–0.6) 2.4 (0.0–5.6)
70 1.2 (0.2–2.3) 32.0 (27.2–36.8) 0.2 (0.0–0.7) 2.7 (0.0–6.4)
60 1.4 (0.2–2.6) 37.3 (31.7–43.0) 0.3 (0.0–0.8) 3.2 (0.0–7.5)
50 1.7 (0.2–3.2) 44.7 (38.0–51.5) 0.3 (0.0–1.0) 3.8 (0.0–9.0)
40 2.1 (0.3–4.0) 55.9 (47.5–64.3) 0.4 (0.0–1.3) 4.8 (0.0–11.3)
30 2.8 (0.4–5.3) 74.6 (63.4–85.8) 0.6 (0.0–1.7) 6.3 (0.0–15.1)
20 4.2 (0.5–7.9) 0.8 (0.0–2.5) 9.5 (0.0–22.6)
10 8.5 (1.1–15.9) 1.7 (0.0–5.0) 19.0 (0.0–45.2)
*

CI = confidence interval; – = > 100% prevalence calculated.

Biologically plausible estimates of the true prevalence of respective Taenia species.