Table 1.
Summary for the tested samples ofChimonanthus nitens
| Analyte |
Regression |
Precision (RSD%,n = 6) |
Stability (RSD, %) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Linear regression equation |
Linear range [μg] | R2 | Instrument | Identical plate |
Different plate |
||
| Linalool |
Y = 125.1 x + 368.8 |
1.80-18.00 |
0.990 |
0.6 |
3.5 |
9.7 |
2.0 |
| β-caryophyllene |
Y = 356.7 x + 195.7 |
0.72-10.87 |
0.992 |
1.5 |
8.0 |
9.0 |
3.0 |
| cineole |
Y = 206.2 x + 199.9 |
0.76-11.40 |
0.991 |
4.8 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
3.3 |
| scopoletin |
Y = 45.2 x + 45.5 |
0.011-0.064 |
0.996 |
1.2 |
2.6 |
5.4 |
4.2 |
| scoparone | Y = 48.7 x + 236.4 | 0.015-0.045 | 0.993 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 8.3 | 2.5 |