Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 11;14(3):e82. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1812

Table 2.

Comparison between respondents followed up and respondents lost to follow-up after 6 weeks and 6 months.

Characteristic 6-week follow-up 6-month follow-up
Followed up
(n = 449)
Lost to follow-up
(n = 674)
Followed up
(n = 291)
Lost to follow-up
(n = 832)
Age (years), mean (SD) 50.1 (12.2) 49.4 (12.6) 50.0 (12.2)* 48.1 (12.3)*
Male, % (n) 44.5% (200) 49.7% (335) 45.5% (133) 48.4% (402)
In experimental condition, % (n) 49.9% (224) 48.7% (328) 49.3% (144) 49.1% (408)
Educational level, % (n)
High 19% (85) 22.7% (153) 19% (54) 22.1% (184)
Medium 45.9% (206) 45.5% (307) 45.2% (132) 45.8% (381)
Low 35.2% (158) 31.8% (214) 36.3% (106) 32.0% (266)
Dutch, % (n) 98.2% (441) 97.3% (656) 97.3% (284) 97.8% (813)
With cardiovascular diseases, % (n) 12% (52) 8% (54) 11% (31) 9% (75)
With respiratory diseases, % (n) 15% (68) 14% (93) 17% (49) 13.5% (112)
Number of cigarettes smoked/day, mean (SD) 19.8 (12.1) 17.8 (6.1) 19.5 (11.4) 21.0 (12.7)
FTNDa score (range 1–10), mean (SD) 4.8 (2.3) 4.6 (2.3) 4.7 (2.3)* 5.2 (2.5)*
Number of previous quit attempts, mean (SD) 5.0 (10.6) 5.5 (5.9) 5.1 (10.0) 5.6 (19.5)

a Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence.

*P < .05.