Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 28;14(3):e88. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1848

Table 4.

Summary of mediational analyses for the adolescent group.

Group R 2 Adjusted
R 2
R 2 F df Beta sr2
Adolescent alliance predicting adolescent compliance at 6-month follow-up
Step 1
Adolescent alliance .14 .13 .14 13.10 1,80 .38** .14
Adolescent alliance predicting CGASa scores at 6-month follow-up
Step 1
Baseline CGAS scores .21 .20 .21 20.89 1,79 .51*** .24
Step 2
Baseline CGAS scores .26 .24 .05 4.89 2,78 .50*** .24
Adolescent alliance .22* .05
Adolescent compliance predicting CGAS scores at 6-month follow-up
Step 1
Baseline CGAS scores .21 .20 .21 21.68 1,82 .49*** .24
Step 2
Baseline CGAS scores .25 .24 .05 4.91 2,81 .48*** .24
Adolescent compliance .22* .05
Adolescent compliance as a mediator in the relationship between adolescent alliance and outcome on CGAS at 6-month follow-up
Step 1
Baseline CGAS scores .25 .24 .25 13.30 1,79 .52*** .26
Step 2
Baseline CGAS scores .28 .25 .02 2.42 3,77 .51*** .26
Adolescent compliance .16 .02
Adolescent alliance .17 .02

a Children’s Global Assessment Scale.

*P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure